Many authors agree that writing content is only half the battle because the more time-consuming, labour-intensive stage, the editorial phase, has just begun. It is always recommended at this point for an author to avail themselves of a second reader, such as an editing service or proofreading service, to give the text a thorough check.
It is a sad and irritating fact that authors unwittingly introduce many errors into their work, all of which will require removal. Thus, readers, editors and proofreaders should follow this set of rules when reviewing context, as any professional editing service or proofreading service would. Read slowlyIdeally, read the text aloud to help identify errors and help clarify the work’s depth and quality. However, this approach is not always practical, especially if one happens to be in a library. Regardless, it always pays to check the text slowly and carefully. Doing so means the reader focuses on the words and can identify any errors, inconsistencies or problems with flow. Perhaps there are grammar issues, or a point may need expanding to add further depth. Writing can often become a blur. An author may have to contend with a deadline or may have many thousands of words that they want to commit to the page. Either way, the result is a deluge of words most likely riddled with spelling mishaps, unclear themes, missing punctuation and so on. Reading slowly is like the calm after the storm. Now is the perfect chance to piece together any broken parts of material and tie them together. It is certainly an approach advocated by an editing service or proofreading service: word by word, line by line, and always focusing on the intended message. Use a spell checkerDon’t rely on spell check software in terms of context, flow or nuance. But for picking up errors missed by the human eye, no tool is better. It’s easy to miss a missing full stop at the end of a pages-long section full of dense technical information, for example. A spell checker will highlight such issues for the reader, editing service or proofreading service to review and fix. Read from the bottomThis unconventional approach can pay dividends because it requires the reader to concentrate on the content. By removing the familiar context, it becomes possible to focus on what the author has said rather than on what they have tried to say. Use a ruler and slowly work backwards from the last sentence to identify those irritating superficial errors such as grammar, punctuation and spelling mistakes and whether the content requires clarification, expansion or removal. Use a second readerThe objective gaze of a second reader, perhaps in the form of a peer, editing service or proofreading service, will always benefit the author. An impartial reader invariably picks up the errors an author misses because the author’s brain is programmed to pick up what they want to say and not necessarily what they wrote down; a second reader will highlight issues and where the author can improve their work. Read More: A Quick Guide to Paraphrasing Source Material During the Writing Process Follow These Simple Paraphrasing Steps to Avoid Plagiarism
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |